Published Papers

Theme Issue Papers

Application and effect evaluation of virtual reality technology in teacher education

Fang Ji and Kyung Yee Kim
Pages: 1-6Published: 11 Feb 2025
DOI: 10.33430/V31N3THIE-2024-0033
Cite thisHide

Ji F and Kim KY, Application and effect evaluation of virtual reality technology in teacher education, HKIE Transactions, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Theme Issue), Article THIE-2024-0033, 2025, 10.33430/V31N3THIE-2024-0033

 Copy

Abstract:

The project is based on virtual reality to improve students' perception of engineering drawing knowledge. A 3D modellingassisted teaching system based on a mobile terminal was constructed by integrating augmented reality technology into classroom teaching. Then, this paper uses visual overlay and reinforcement to highlight the user's subjective feelings. It aims to construct an effective transformation route between the perception-linked perspective and the entity to improve the perceptibility of abstract form. In combination with classroom teaching and guidance, students can consciously enhance the cognitive function of graphic perception in view interpretation. The function sharing is realised through the configuration of the software module, and the interaction efficiency between the modules is improved. The advantages of this method in reducing energy consumption and the signal-to-noise ratio of teaching resources are verified by comparison with existing online education platforms. This method can significantly improve the efficiency of the whole system.

Keywords:

Engineering drawing; AR; cell phone; education system; transmission energy consumption

Reference List:

  1. Abich IVJ, Parker J, Murphy JS and Eudy M (2021). A review of the evidence for training effectiveness with virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality, 25(4), pp. 919-933.
  2. Al-Gindy A, Felix C, Ahmed A, Matoug A and Alkhidir M (2020). Virtual reality: Development of an integrated learning environment for education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(3), pp. 171-175.
  3. Alnagrat AJA, Ismail RC and Idrus SZS (2022). The Opportunities and challenges in virtual reality for virtual laboratories. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 6(2), pp. 73-89.
  4. Álvarez IM, Manero B, Romero-Hernández A, Cárdenas M and Masó I (2024). Virtual reality platform for teacher training on classroom climate management: evaluating user acceptance. Virtual Reality, 28(2), pp. 1-17.
  5. Atli K, Selman W and Ray A (2021). A comprehensive multicomponent neurosurgical course with use of virtual reality: modernizing the medical classroom. Journal of surgical education, 78(4), pp. 1350-1356.
  6. Cannavo A and Lamberti F (2020). How blockchain, virtual reality, and augmented reality are converging, and why. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 10(5), pp. 6-13.
  7. Ebadi S and Ebadijalal M (2022). The effect of Google Expeditions virtual reality on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), pp. 1975-2000.
  8. Hamilton D, McKechnie J, Edgerton E and Wilson C (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), pp. 1-32.
  9. Harfouche AL and Nakhle F (2020). Creating bioethics distance learning through virtual reality. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(11), pp. 1187-1192.
  10. Johnson-Glenberg MC, Bartolomea H and Kalina E (2021). Platform is not destiny: Embodied learning effects comparing 2D desktop to 3D virtual reality STEM experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), pp. 1263-1284.
  11. Kolla S, Elgawly M, Gaughan JP and Goldman E (2020). Medical student perception of a virtual reality training module for anatomy education. Medical Science Educator, 30(3), pp. 1201-1210.
  12. Ledwos N, Mirchi N, Bissonnette V, Winkler-Schwartz A, Yilmaz R and Del Maestro RF (2021). Virtual reality anterior cervical discectomy and fusion simulation on the novel sim-ortho platform: validation studies. Operative Neurosurgery, 20(1), pp. 74-82.
  13. Liu R, Wang L, Lei J, Wang Q and Ren Y (2020). Effects of an immersive virtual reality-based classroom on students' learning performance in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6) pp. 2034-2049.
  14. Pellas N, Mystakidis S and Kazanidis I (2021). Immersive Virtual Reality in K-12 and Higher Education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25(3), pp. 835-861.
  15. Rogers MP, DeSantis AJ, Janjua H, Barry TM and Kuo PC (2021). The future surgical training paradigm: Virtual reality and machine learning in surgical education. Surgery, 169(5), pp. 1250-1252.
  16. Scavarelli A, Arya A and Teather RJ (2021). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Reality, 25(1), pp. 257-277.
  17. Smutny P (2023). Learning with virtual reality: A market analysis of educational and training applications. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), pp. 6133-6146.
>> more<< less