Published Papers

Volume 30 - Issue 3 (Theme Issue)
Theme Issue Papers

Integration of BIM and LCA: a system to predict and optimise embodied carbon for prefabricated buildings

Song Ge, Xuan Zhang and Xueqing Zhang
Pages: 44-55Published: 28 Mar 2024
DOI: 10.33430/V30N3THIE-2022-0052

Abstract:

This paper presents the development of a system for automatically predicting and optimising embodied carbon of prefabricated buildings during the design phase. Building information modelling (BIM) is selected as the working environment from data input to results display, highly improving the automation level of carbon assessment. Besides, automatic carbon assessment for on-site installation is achieved by developing a component-oriented on-site emission factor database from a Chinese code. This system also supports optimising embodied carbon by providing various low-carbon alternatives from the perspectives of selecting construction materials, transportation modes, and installation methods. This system is applied to a ten-storey office building for demonstration. It is found that the system can accurately estimate and efficiently reduce the embodied carbon emissions of prefabricated buildings.

Keywords:

Embodied carbon; life cycle assessment; optimisation; building information model; prefabricated building

Reference List:

  1. Anand CK and Amor B (2017). Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: a critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, pp. 408-416. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.058. 
  2. Bahramian M (2020). Life cycle assessment of the building industry: an overview of two decades of research (1995-2018). Energy and Buildings, 219, 109917. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.enbuild.2020.109917.
  3. Chau CK, Leung TM and Ng WY (2015). A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Applied Energy, 143, pp. 395-413. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023.
  4. Chau CK, Yik FWH, Hui WK, Liu HC and Yu HK (2007). Environmental impacts of building materials and building services components for commercial buildings in Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), pp. 1840-1851. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.10.004.
  5. Dong YH, Jaillon L, Chu P and Poon CS (2015). Comparing carbon emissions of precast and castin-situ construction methods – a case study of highrise private building. Construction and Building Materials, 99, pp. 39-53. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.145.
  6. Dong YH and Ng ST (2015). A life cycle assessment model for evaluating the environmental impacts of building construction in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 89, pp. 183-191. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.020.
  7. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, Stechow CV, Zwickel T and Minx JC (Ed.) (2015). Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Hammond GP and Jones CI (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineering: Energy, 161(2), pp. 87-98. Available from: doi: 10.1680/ ener.2008.161.2.87
  9. Hong Kong Building Department (2017). Preaccepted Modular Integrated Construction Systems/ Components. Available at: . [Accessed on 18 August 2022].
  10. Kamari A, Kotula BM, and Schultz CPL (2022), A BIM-based LCA tool for sustainable building design during the early design stage. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(2), pp. 217-244. Available from: doi: 10.1108/SASBE-09-2021-0157.
  11. Kofoworola OF and Gheewala SH (2009). Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand. Energy and Buildings, 41(10), pp. 1076-1083. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.enbuild.2009.06.002.
  12. Kumanayake R, Luo H and Paulusz N (2018). Assessment of material related embodied carbon of an office building in Sri Lanka. Energy and Buildings, 166, pp. 250-257. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.enbuild.2018.01.065.
  13. Lee S, Tae S, Roh S and Kim T (2015). Green template for life cycle assessment of buildings based on building information modeling: focus on embodied environmental impact. Sustainability, 7(12), 16498- 16512. Available from: doi: 10.3390/su71215830.
  14. Li S, Yan H, Chen J and Shen L (2017). A life cycle analysis approach for embodied carbon for a residential building. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Singapore, pp. 1185-1196. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-981- 10-0855-9_104.
  15. Luo Z, Cang Y, Zhang N, Yang L and Liu J (2019). A quantitative process-based inventory study on material embodied carbon emissions of residential, office, and commercial buildings in China. Journal of Thermal Science, 28(6), pp. 1236-1251. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11630-019-1165-x.
  16. Meyer L, Brinkman S, Van Kesteren L, LeprinceRinguet L and Van Boxmeer F (2015). IPCC, 2014: climate change 2014: synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
  17. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD) (2015). Chinese Consumption Quota of Construction and Decoration Engineering. Beijing: China Planning Press.
  18. MOHURD (2019). Building Carbon Calculation Standard. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
  19. Nässén J, Holmberg J, Wadeskog A and Nyman M (2007). Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: an input-output analysis. Energy, 32(9), pp. 1593-1602. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.002.
  20. Nizam RS, Zhang C and Tian L (2018). A BIM based tool for assessing embodied energy for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 170, pp. 1-14. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.067.
  21. Pomponi F and Moncaster A (2016). Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – what does the evidence say? Journal of Environmental Management, 181, pp. 687-700. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036.
  22. Potrč Obrecht T, Röck M, Hoxha E and Passer A (2020). BIM and LCA integration: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5534. Available from: doi: 10.3390/su12145534.
  23. Praseeda KI, Reddy BV and Mani M (2016). Embodied and operational energy of urban residential buildings in India. Energy and Buildings, 110, pp. 211-219. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enbuild.2015.09.072.
  24. Ramesh T, Prakash R and Shukla KK (2011). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy and Building, 42(10), pp. 1592-1600. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007.
  25. Röck M, Hollberg A, Habert G and Passer A (2017). LCA and BIM: integrated assessment and visualization of building elements’ embodied impacts for design guidance in early stages. Procedia CIRP, 69, pp. 218-223. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.procir.2017.11.087.
  26. Safari K and AzariJafari H (2021). Challenges and opportunities for integrating BIM and LCA: methodological choices and framework development. Sustainable Cities Society, 67, 102728. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102728.
  27. Santos R, Costa AA, Silvestre JD and Pyl L (2019). Integration of LCA and LCC analysis within a BIMbased environment. Automation in Construction, 103, pp. 127-149. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.autcon.2019.02.011.
  28. Santos R, Costa AA, Silvestre JD and Pyl L (2020). Development of a BIM-based environmental and economic life cycle assessment tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121705. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121705.
  29. Schwartz Y, Eleftheriadis S, Raslan R and Mumovic D (2016). Semantically enriched BIM life cycle assessment to enhance buildings’ environmental performance. In: Proceedings of the CIBSE Technical Symposium. Edinburgh, UK.
  30. Tally (2017). Reference. [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 20 May 2023].
  31. Tam VWY, Zhou Y, Illankoon C and Le KN (2022). A critical review on BIM and LCA integration using the ISO 14040 framework. Building and Environment, 213, 108865. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.buildenv.2022.108865.
  32. Thormark C (2002). A low energy building in a life cycle-its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential. Building and Environment, 37(4), pp. 429-435. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ S0360-1323(01)00033-6.
  33. Wastiels L and Decuypere R (2019). Identification and comparison of LCA-BIM integration strategies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323(1), 012101. Available from: doi: 10.1088/1755- 1315/323/1/012101.
  34. Xue K, Hossain MU, Liu M, Ma M and Zhang Y (2021). BIM integrated LCA for promoting circular economy towards sustainable construction: an analytical review. Sustainability, 133(3), 1310. Available from: doi: 10.3390/su13031310.
  35. Zhang X, Shen L and Zhang L (2013). Life cycle assessment of the air emissions during building construction process: a case study in Hong Kong. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, pp. 160-169. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ j.rser.2012.09.024.
  36. Zhang X and Wang F (2016). Hybrid input-output analysis for life-cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions of China’s building sector. Building and Environment, 104, pp. 188-197. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.018.
  37. Zhou W (2021). Carbon emission estimation of prefabricated buildings based on life cycle assessment model. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 20(1), pp. 147-152. Available from: doi: https://doi. org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i01.015
>> more<< less